RESTORASI LANSKAP PERMUKIMAN DUSUN PANCURAN KOTA SALATIGA DENGAN PENDEKATAN GREEN LANDSCAPE
Abstrak
Peningkatan jumlah penduduk dari tahun ke tahun menyebabkan perkembangan kota menjadi pesat. Kota Salatiga sebagai salah satu kota di Jawa Tengah yang mengalami peningkatan penduduk secara signifikan. Salah satu daerah yang mengalami dampak dari pertumbuhan penduduk adalah Pancuran. Wilayah ini merupakan daerah kumuh di Kota Salatiga. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi kondisi kenyamanan termal dan kualitas visual wilayah Pancuran, serta untuk mengidentifikasi persepsi dan preferensi masyarakat Pancuran terkait restorasi lanskap menggunakan pendekatan Green Landscape. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan desain Ruang Terbuka Hijau (RTH) yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan keinginan masyarakat RW IV. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah wilayah Pancuran RW IV Kota Salatiga memiliki kondisi ekologi yang belum memadai yaitu kurangnya sumber daya alam seperti udara bersih dan lahan subur, tingginya populasi, serta gangguan pada siklus alamiah seperti perubahan iklim yang drastis, kenaikan suhu rata-rata, atau penurunan kualitas tanah. Hal ini disebabkan oleh padatnya penduduk di wilayah Pancuran serta kondisi visual yang rendah akibat banyaknya bangunan yang tidak seharusnya ada. Masyarakat di wilayah Pancuran merasa masih kekurangan RTH di RW IV. Rekomendasi yang diberikan untuk masyarakat wilayah Pancuran RW IV ini yaitu dengan membuat RTH dengan pendekatan Green Landscape di setiap RT-nya. Sehingga pada masing-masing lingkungan RT-nya memiliki kondisi ekologi dan sirkulasi udara yang baik.
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Unduh
Referensi
Alfinaini NAD, Putra MA, Rahmawati DA, Salsabillah FA, Aisy R, Suari IGAAPR, Bagaskara KS, Umniyyah Z. 2023. pemanfaatan lahan sempit dengan sistem vertikultur Desa Mayang, Kec. Mayang, Jember. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Applied 2(1): 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jpma.v2i1.39464
Arifin HS. 2015. Revitalisasi Ruang Terbuka Biru Sebagai Upaya Manajemen Lanskap pada Skala Bio-Regional. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan. 1(3): 172-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v1i3.10294
Atmaja. 2009. Statistik untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Yogyakarta (ID): Andi.
Crane JH. 2010. Key lime growing in the Florida Landscape, University of Florida, IFAS Extention, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-ch092-2010
Faradilla E, Kaswanto RL, Arifin HS. 2018. Analisis Kesesuaian Lahan untuk Ruang Terbuka Hijau dan Ruang Terbuka Biru di Sentul City, Bogor. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 9(2) 101-109. doi: 10.29244/jli.v9i2.17398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v9i2.17398
Fitriana AF, Kaswanto RL, Nurhayati HSA. 2023. Strategi Manajemen Lanskap yang Dikembangkan pada Taman Kota di Kota Purwokerto. SPACE. 10(2). doi: 10.24843/JRS.2023.v10.i02.p09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/JRS.2023.v10.i02.p09
Griggs AR. 2009. Psychologi. USA: Wort Publisher.
Joko G, Winarno. 2019. Klimatologi Pertanian. Bandarlampung (ID): Pusaka Media.
Mosyaftiani A, Kaswanto RL, Arifin HS. 2018. Potensi tumbuhan liar di sempadan terbangun Sungai Ciliwung di Kota Bogor Sebagai Upaya Restorasi Ekosistem Sungai. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan. 5(1): 1-13. doi: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v5i1.29781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v5i1.29781
Mubarok S, Ananda SD, Farida F, Fadilah A, Sudirja R.. 2021. Evaluasi tiga sistem budidaya di lahan sempit pada budidaya dua kultivar bayam di Kota Bekasi. Kultivasi. 20(2): 73–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/kultivasi.v20i2.32022
Prastiyo YB, Kaswanto RL, Arifin HS. 2018. Analisis Ekologi Lanskap Agroforestri pada Riparian Sungai Ciliwung di Kota Bogor. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia. 9(2): 81-90. doi: 10.29244/jli.v9i2.16964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v9i2.16964
Ramdhan M, Arifin HS, Suharnoto Y, Tarigan SD. 2018. Penilaian indeks kota ramah air untuk Kota Bogor untuk Penyusunan Strategi Kebijakan. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan. 5(1): 27-38. doi: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v5i1.28757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v5i1.28757
Soraya SN, Jumarang MI, Muliadi M. 2020. Kajian tingkat kenyamanan berdasarkan suhu udara, kelembapan OLR (Outgoing Longwave Radiation) dan angin. Jurnal Prisma Fisika. 8(2): 147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/pf.v8i2.42612
Storey J. 2010. Cultural Studies dan Kajian Budaya Pop. Yogyakarta (ID): Jalasutra.
Suprihantini LR. 2019. Efektivitas Penyuluhan dengan Media Tiga Dimensi terhadap Perubahan Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Tindakan Konsumsi Buah dan Sayur di MI Tawakkal Denpasar. Disertasi. Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Denpasar.
Sutrisno B. 2018. Kampung Pncuran, Perjalanan dari Kumuh Menjadi Tangguh (Accessed: 5 September 2019).
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
