ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS PENGGUNAAN PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA (PGPR) UNTUK PENINGKATAN PERTANIAN BERKELANJUTAN
Abstract
The increase in the world's human population is a significant challenge for agricultural and food production. This causes farmers to use excessive chemical fertilizers so that they exploit fertile land to meet human food needs. This challenge has also caused Indonesia to be ranked third highest in Southeast Asia with a global hunger index. So that conditions do not get worse, it is necessary to carry out sustainable agricultural practices that are environmentally friendly. This sustainable agricultural practice can be carried out using Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). The method used in this study was to make inoculants and PGPR liquid formulations which were then applied to Red Beans to observe their development and compared to Red Beans which were not given PGPR liquid. The study found that the impact of using PGPR on Red Beans was that it could increase plant height, leaf height, and number of leaves. This proves that the use of PGPR can be an effective solution to be applied to agriculture in Indonesia.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Amhar, U. 2020. Pengaruh lama inkubasi PGPR bambu terhadap jumlah mikroba sebagai bio-aktivator. Skripsi: Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram.
Arifin, H.S., Munandar, A., Schultin, K.G., Kaswanto, R.L. 2012. The role and impacts of small-scale, homestead agroforestry systems ("pekarangan") on household prosperity: An analysis of agro-ecological zones of Java, Indonesia. International Journal of AgriScience, 2(10), 896-914.
Astija, Yulisa, Alibasyah, L., Febriani, V.I. 2022. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) akar bambu, kacang hijau, dan putri malu untuk meningkatkan pertumbuhan bintil akar kacang hijau. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi. 10(2), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v10i2.5291.
Elizabeth, R. 2021. Pemakaian biogas: Hemat biaya bahan bakar dan tambahan pendapatan rumah tangga mendukung ketahanan energi. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 8(3), 151-175. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v8i3.28067.
Gopi, G.K., Meenakumari, K.S., Anith, K.N., Nysanth, N.S., Subha, P. 2020. Application of liquid formulation of a mixture of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria helps reduce the use of chemical fertilizers in Amaranthus (Amaranthus tricolor L.). Rhizosphere, 15, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100212.
Ichwandil. 2015. Membumikan kebijakan ketahanan pangan. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 1(2), 97-104. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jkebijakan/article/view/10300.
Kaswanto, R.L. 2017. Management of landscape services for improving community welfare in West Java, Indonesia. Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Society 251–270.
Kumar, A., Patel, J.S., Meena, V.S., Srivastava, R. 2019. Recent advances of pgpr based approaches for stress tolerance in plants for sustainable agriculture. Biocatalysis and Agriculture Biotechnology, 20(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101271.
Lewar, Y., Hasan, A., Bunga, J.A., Vertygo, S. 2020. Pertumbuhan dan hasil kacang merah varietas inerie di dataran rendah akibat pemberian pupuk NPK dan Biostimulan Amazing Bio Growth. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan, 20(3), 237-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v20i3.1848.
Mohanty, P., Singh, P.K., Chakraborty, D. Mishra, S. Pattnaik, R. 2021. Insight into the role of PGPR in sustainable agriculture and environment. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.667150.
Mucharam, I., E. Rustiadi, A. Fauzi, Harianto. 2022. Signifikansi pengembangan indikator pertanian berkelanjutan untuk mengevaluasi kinerja pembangunan pertanian Indonesia. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 9(2): 61-81. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i2.28038.
Naihati, Y. F., Taolin, R.I.C.O., Rusae, A. 2018. Pengaruh takaran dan frekuensi aplikasi PGPR terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman selada (Lactuca sativa L.). Savana Cendana: Jurnal Pertanian Konservasi Lahan Kering. 3(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.32938/sc.v3i01.215.
Noor, S., Nurhadi, S. 2022. Manfaat, cara perbanyakan dan aplikasi Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). Agriekstensia: Jurnal Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pertanian, 21(1), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.34145/agriekstensia.v21i1.1877.
Nugraha, E., Noertjahyani, Parlinah, L. 2023. Pengaruh konsentrasi PGPR (Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria) terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman kangkung (Ipomoea Reptans Poir) varietas bika. OrchidAgro, 3(1), 11-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.35138/orchidagro.v3i1.513.
Patading, G.F., Ai, A.I. 2021. Efektivitas penyiraman PGPR (Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria) terhadap tinggi, lebar daun, dan jumlah daun bawang merah (Allium cepa L.). Biofaal Jurnal, 2(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.30598/biofaal.v2i1pp35-41.
Pereira, S.I.A., Abreu, D., Moreira, H., Vega, A., Castro, P.M.L. 2020. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) improve the growth and nutrient use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.) under water deficit conditions. Heliyon, 6, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05106.
Prabewi, N., Hartati, P., Fauzi, M.N. 2022. Perbedaan waktu fermentasi menggunakan fermentator PGPR (Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobakteria) akar bambu untuk pembuatan Pupuk Organik Cair (POC) urine sapi kandungan nutrisi tinggi. Jurnal Penelitian Peternakan Terpadu, 4(6), 17-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.36626/jppt.v4i6.859.
Ristiana, F., Tumbelaka, M.S., Nangoi, R. 2022. The effect of PGPR (Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria) bio fertilization on the growth and production of lettage (Lactuca sativa L.). J Agro Terapan, 3(3), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.35791/jat.v3i1.38276.
Sitawati, M.B., Sintawati, Fajriani, S. 2022. Efektivitas Plant Growth Promotion Rhizobacteria (PGPR) dan Pupuk NPK terhadap pertumbuhan dan pembungaan tanaman Aster Ericoides (Symphyotrichum ericoides). J. Hort. Indonesia, 13(2), 64-71. http://doi.org/10.29244/jhi.13.2.64-71.
Sjaf, S., Kaswanto, R.L., Hidayat, N.K., Barlan, Z.A., Elson, L., Sampean, S., Gunadi, H. 2021. Measuring achievement of sustainable development goals in rural area: a case study of Sukamantri Village in Bogor District, West Java, Indonesia. Sodality: J. Sosiologi Pedesaan, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22500/9202133896
Vocciante, M., Grifoni, M., Fusini, D., Petruzzelli, G., Franchi, E.. 2022. The role of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Mitigating Plant’s Environmental Stresses. Applied Sciences MDPI, 12, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031231.
Wijaya, O., Juniawan, W., Widodo. 2021. Alternatif Kebijakan Ketahanan Pangan Wilayah Kabupaten Banyumas dengan Pendekatan Cluster Analysis, Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 9(3), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i3.32799.
Copyright (c) 2023 RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
