KOMPARASI DAN IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN DIGITALISASI PERTANIAN: PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN
Abstract
The rapid advancement of digital technology brought significant opportunities and challenges to the digitization of the agricultural sector. This study had comprehensive goals, namely: 1) identifying various government policies that supported the implementation of agricultural digitization, 2) conducting an in-depth analysis of the magnitude of opportunities offered by agricultural digitization, taking into account the potential and existing obstacles, and 3) providing policy recommendations for the development of agricultural digitization. Through a thorough analysis of various policies and initiatives that were in place, this review successfully identified strategies that were successful in promoting agricultural digitization. Collaborations between government agencies, technology companies, and agricultural organizations were considered key in facilitating the development and implementation of innovative solutions tailored to the needs of the agricultural sector. Overall, agricultural digitization offered significant opportunities to transform the agricultural sector and address challenges related to food security, sustainability, and farmers' livelihoods. However, careful consideration of policies and their effective implementation was necessary to achieve meaningful results.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Basso, B., Antle, J. 2020. Digital agriculture to design sustainable agricultural systems. Nat. Sustain. 3, 254–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0510-0.
Bank Dunia. 2020. Data-driven digital agriculture: Knowledge and learning platform. Worldbank group. Agriculture and Food. https://collaboration.worldbank.org/content/sites/collaboration-for-development/en/groups/digital-and-data-driven-agriculture-cop.html.
Beanstalk Agtech. 2023. Teknologi Pertanian Digital dalam Transformasi Sektor Pertanian dan Petani Kecil di Indonesia. Beanstalk Agtech, ICASEPS dan Universitas Brawijaya.
Blok, V., Gremmen, B. 2018. Agricultural technologies as living machines: Toward a biomimetic conceptualization of smart farming technologies. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 21(2), 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2018.1509491.
Clapp, J., Ruder, S.L. 2020. Precision technologies for agriculture: Digital farming, gene-edited crops, and the politics of sustainability. Glob. Environ. Polit., 20, 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00566.
Eastwood, C., Klerkx, L., Nettle, R. 2017. Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: Case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies. Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.008.
Firdaus, M. 2021. Digitalisasi Pertanian: (Urgensi, Lesson Learned dan Skema Closed Loop). IPB University.
Fairbairn, M., Guthman, J. 2020. Agri-food tech discovers silver linings in the pandemic. Agric. Hum. Values, 37(3), 587–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10052-6.
Fatmasari, N., Restuhadi F., Yulida. 2015. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku petani dalam menerima operasi pangan Riau Makmur di Sembilan Kabupaten Provinsi Riau. SEPA, 12(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.20961/sepa.v12i1.14196.
Firnawati, Kaswanto, R.L., Sjaf, S. 2021. Mapping the village forest of pattaneteang through drone participatory mapping. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 879(1), 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/879/1/012028.
Garske, B., Bau, A., Ekardt, F., 2021. Digitalization and AI in European agriculture: A strategy for achieving climate and biodiversity targets?. Sustainability, 13(9), 4652. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094652.
Ilyas. 2022. Optimalisasi peran petani milenial dan digitalisasi pertanian dalam pengembangan pertanian di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 24(2), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.30872/jfor.v24i2.10364.
Huberty, M. 2015. Awaiting the second big data revolution: From digital noise to value creation. J. Ind., Compét. Trade, 15, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-014-0190-4.
Kaswanto, R.L., Aurora, R.M., Yusri, D., Sjaf, S. dan Barus, S. 2021. Kesesuaian lahan untuk komoditas unggulan pertanian di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Utara. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 19(2), 189-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/akp.v19n2.
Katzir, R. 2020. Agricultural development in Israel. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. CentrF for International Agricultural Develop-ment Cooperation (CINADCO). https://www.cityfarmer.org/Israelperiurban.html.
Keogh, M., Henry, M. 2016. The Implications of Digital Agriculture and Big Data for Australian Agriculture. Sydney: Australian Farm Institute.
Kilmanun, J.C., Astuti, D.W. 2020. Potensi dan kendala revolusi industri 4.0. di sektor pertanian. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pertanian Kesiapan Sumber Daya Pertanian dan Inovasi Spesifik Lokasi Memasuki Era Industri 4.0. Semarang: Balai Besar Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian.
Klerkx, L., Rose, D. 2020. Dealing with the game-changing technologies of agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways?. Global Food Security, 24, 100347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.10034.
Lajoie-O'Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S., Klerkx, L. 2020. The future(s) of digital agriculture and sustainable food systems: An analysis of high-level policy documents. Ecosyst. Serv., 45, 101183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183.
Laugerette, T., Stöckel, F. 2016. From Agriculture to AgTech: Executive summary. An industry transformed beyond molecules and chemicals. Monitor Delloite.
Leonard, B., Kinsella, A., O’Donoghue, C., Farrell, M., Mahon, M. 2017. Policy drivers of farm succession and inheritance. Land Use Policy, 61, 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.006.
López, I.D., Corrales, J.C. 2018. A smart farming approach in automatic detection of favorable conditions for planting and crop production in the upper basin of Cauca River. Dalam Angelov, P., Iglesias, J., Corrales, J. Advances in Information and Communication Technologies for Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Edinburgh: Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70187-5_17.
Lottes, P., Khanna, R., Pfeifer, J., Siegwart, R., Stachniss, C. 2017. UAV-based crop and weed classification for smart farming. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 3024-3031. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989347.
Malta. 2016. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kemandirian petani dalam pengambilan keputusan untuk keberlanjutan usahatani (Kasus: petani di Desa Sukaharja-Kabupaten Bogor). Sosiohumaniora, 18(2), 118-124. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i2.9945.
Mangurai, S.U.N.M., Solikhin A., Octaviani E.A., Anidah. 2021. Progressing Indonesia’s agriculture 4.0 through research and application towards ASEAN digitalization initiatives in the Covid-19 pandemic. ASEAN-CRN.
Mucharam, I., Rustiadi, E., Fauzi, A., Harianto. 2022. Signifikansi pengembangan indikator pertanian berkelanjutan untuk mengevaluasi kinerja pembangunan pertanian Indonesia. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 9(2), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i2.28038.
Mukherjee, S., Baral, M.M., Chittipaka, V., Srivastava, S.C., Pal, S.K. 2021. Discussing the impact of industry 4.0 in agriculture supply Chain. Dalam Agrawal, R., Jain, J.K., Yadav, V.S., Manupati, V.K., Varela, L. Recent Advances in Smart Manufacturing and Materials. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Singapore: Springer.
Myklevy, M., Doherty, P., Makower, J. 2016. The New Grand Strategy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Nugroho, T., Abidin, Z., Marlina, L. 2019. Dampak fenomena el nino terhadap pendapatan usahatani dan pola tanam petani padi di Kecamatan Natar Kabupaten Lampung Selatan. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis, 7(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.23960/jiia.v7i1.75-82.
Patricia, S. Listrik tingkatkan produktivitas pertanian. https://www.kompas.id/baca/ekonomi/2020/09/04/listrik-tingkatkan-produktivitas-pertanian.
Rose, D.C., Chilvers, J. 2018. Agriculture 4.0: broadening responsible innovation in an era of smart farming. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2(87), Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087.
Rotz, S., Duncan, E., Small, M., Botschner, J., Dara, R., Mosby, I., Reed, M., Fraser, E.D. 2019. The politics of digital agricultural technologies: A preliminary review. Social. Rural, 59 (2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12233.
Saiz-Rubio, V., Rovira-M´as, F. 2020. From smart farming towards agriculture 5.0: A review on crop data management. Agronomy, 10(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020207.
Schrijver, R. 2016. Precision agriculture and the future of farming in Europe. Europe: Scientific Foresight Uni (STOA).
Sjaf, S., Kaswanto, R.L., Hidayat, N.K., Barlan, Z.A., Elson, L., Sampean, S., Gunadi, H. 2021. Measuring achievement of sustainable development goals in rural area: A case study of sukamantri village in Bogor District, West Java, Indonesia. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22500/9202133896.
Sukur, M., Susanto. 2014. Model sistem inovasi pertanian berbasis IT dengan teknologi mobile. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK , 19(2), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.35315/dinamik.v19i2.4103.
Verdouw, C.N., Wolfert, J., Tekinerdogan, B. 2016. Internet of Things in agriculture. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 11, 035. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201611035.
Weersink, A., Fraser, E., Pannell, D., Duncan, E., Rotz, S. 2018. Opportunities and challenges for big data in agricultural and environmental analysis. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 10, 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053654.
Wilde, S. 2016. The Future of Technology in Agriculture. The Hague: STT Netherlands Study Centre for Technology Trends.
Zambon, I., Cecchini, M., Egidi, G., Saporito, M.G., Colantoni, A. 2019. Revolution 4.0: Industry vs. agriculture in a future development for SMEs. Processes, 7(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7010036.
Copyright (c) 2023 RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
