Typology of Dairy Production Systems Based on Management Strategies in Paraná State, Brazil

  • R. C. M. Tramontini Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM
  • F. I. Bánkuti Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM
  • M. S. S. Pozza Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM
  • E. M. Massuda Universidade Cesumar - Unicesumar
  • J. C. Damasceno Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM
  • A. M. Dias Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS
  • C. C. B. F. Ítavo Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS
  • L. C. V. Ítavo Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS
  • G. T. Santos Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS / Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM
Keywords: dairy farming, management, productivity

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the typology of dairy production systems in Paraná State using management characteristics related to nutrition, milking, and technical aspects. We applied, in loco, 105 surveys in dairy production systems - DPS, located in Paraná State, Brazil. Variables related to farm structure, farmer social characteristics, and management practices applied in dairy systems, were collected. Exploratory Factor analysis (EFA) was used and resulted in three management factors, i.e., F1 (Nutrition Management), F2 (Technical Management), and F3 (Milking Management). Using factorial scores, cluster analysis was employed to identify homogeneous groups of dairy production systems. The dairy production systems in G2 (N=84 DPS) was characterized by prioritizing nutritional management (F1), which was the opposite result presented by G1 (N=21 DPS). The structural features and social characteristics of G1 and G2 were compared (T-test). The results indicated a great heterogeneity for the structural and productive characteristics of the analyzed dairy systems and socioeconomic characteristics of their managers. Results also indicate that producers with less structure and scale of production (Group 1), need more technical guidance in production system management. For producers with larger structures and scales of production (Group 2), continuous improvement investments are suggested in the three factors analyzed in this work - nutritional, technical, and milking. Such actions may maintain or increase the production and productivity results in these dairy systems. It is concluded that aspects related to nutritional management are the ones that mark the biggest difference between the cases analyzed, followed respectively by factors of technical management and milking management. Typology of dairy systems that adopt greater attention to nutritional management practices is characterized by a greater production structure and greater productivity when compared to a typology of dairy systems that prioritize actions of technical system management and milking management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

R. C. M. Tramontini, Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia (PPZ), Universidade Estadual de Maringá

F. I. Bánkuti , Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia (PPZ), Universidade Estadual de Maringá

M. S. S. Pozza , Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia (PPZ), Universidade Estadual de Maringá

E. M. Massuda , Universidade Cesumar - Unicesumar

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão do Conhecimento das Organizações, Universidade Cesumar (Unicesumar)

J. C. Damasceno, Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia (PPZ), Universidade Estadual de Maringá

A. M. Dias, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal (PPGCA), Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul

C. C. B. F. Ítavo, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal (PPGCA), Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul

L. C. V. Ítavo, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal (PPGCA), Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul

G. T. Santos, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS / Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia (PPZ), Universidade Estadual de Maringá e Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal (PPGCA), Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul.

References

Bánkuti, F. I. & M. M. Caldas. 2018. Geographical milk redistribution in Paraná State, Brazil : consequences of institutional and market changes. J. Rural Stud. 64, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.10.004

Bánkuti, F. I., R. C. Prizon, J. C. Damasceno, M. M. De Brito, M. S. S. Pozza, & P. G. L. Lima. 2020. Farmers’ actions toward sustainability: a typology of dairy farms according to sustainability indicators. Animal. 14:S417-S423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000750

Barnes, A. P. & L. Toma. 2012. A typology of dairy farmer perceptions towards climate change. Clim. Change. 112:507-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0226-2

Beber, C. L., A. F. R. Carpio, M. I. Almadani, & L. Theuvsend. 2019. Dairy supply chain in Southern Brazil: barriers to competitiveness. Int. Food Agribus. Man. 22:651-673. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2018.0091

Bodenmüller Filho, A., J. C. Damasceno, I. T. S. Previdelli, R. G. Santana, C. E. C. O. Ramos, & G. T. Santos. 2010. Tipologia de sistemas de produção baseada nas características do leite. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 39:1832-1839. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000800028

Brito, M. M., F. I. Bánkuti, S. M. S. Bánkuti, G. T. Santos, J. C. Damasceno, & E. M. Massuda. 2015. Horizontal arrangements and competitiveness of Small-Scale Dairy Farmers in Paraná, Brazil. Int. Food Agribus. Man. 18:1-18.

Casali, M., B. S. Mendonça, M. M. De Brito, M. G. R. Santos, P. G. L. Lima, T. T. S. Teixeira, J. C. Damasceno, & F. I. Bánkuti. 2020. Information asymmetry among dairy producers in Paraná, Brazil. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 41:295-306. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n1p295

Defante, L., J. C. Damasceno, F. I. Bánkuti, & C. E. C. O. Ramos. 2019. Typology of dairy production systems that meet Brazilian standards for milk quality. R. Bras. Zootec. 49:e20180023. https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180023

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2019. FAOSTAT. Livestock primary. FAOSTAT, Roma, Italy. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home. [02 February 2020].

Fávero, L. P., P. Belfiore, F. L. Silva, & B. L. Chan. 2009. Análise de Dados: Modelagem Multivariada Para Tomada de Decisões. 3rd ed. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro.

Foddy, W. 1994. Construction Questions for Interviews and Questionnnaries: Theory and Practice in Social. Cambridge University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(10)61110-8

Gelasakis, A. I., G. Rose, R. Giannakou, G. E. Valergakis, A. Theodoridis, P. Fortomaris, & G. Arsenos. 2017. Typology and characteristics of dairy goat production systems in Greece. Livest. Sci. 197:22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.01.003

Guptill, A. 2009. Exploring the conventionalization of organic dairy: Trends and counter-trends in upstate New York. Agric. Hum. Values. 26:29-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9179-0

Hair Jr., J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, & R. E. Anderson. 2009. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Prentice Hall, Saddle River.

IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). 2015. Pesquisa da Pecuária Municipal - PPM. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Brasília. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/agricultura-e-pecuaria/9107-producao-da-pecuaria-municipal.html?=&t=o-que-e. [03 March 2020].

IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). 2018. Censo Agropecuário 2017. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Brasília. https://censos.ibge.gov.br/agro/2017/. [03 March 2020].

IBM (International Business Machine). 2009. Statistical Program for Social Sciences: SPSS. International Business Machine, New York. https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software. [05 January 2020].

Koerich, G., J. C. Damasceno, F. I. Bánkuti, J. L. Parré, & G. T. Santos. 2019. Influence of forage production area, concentrate supply, and workforce on productive results in milk production systems. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 48:e20170177. https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820170177

Kostrowicki, J. 1977. Agricultural typology concept and method. Agric. Syst. 2:33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(77)90015-4

Llanos, E., L. Astigarraga, & V. Picasso. 2018. Energy and economic efficiency in grazing dairy systems under alternative intensification strategies. Eur. J. Agron. 92:133-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.10.010

Marnet, P. G., & M. Komara. 2008. Management systems with extended milking intervals in ruminants: regulation of production and quality of milk. J. Anim. Sci. 86:47-56. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0285

Mattos, C. A. C., & A. C. Santana. 2014. As contribuições da pecuária leiteira para os agricultores familiares: um estudo no Sudeste do estado do Pará. Extensão Rural. 21:56-72. https://doi.org/10.5902/231817967780

Millogo, V., K. Svennersten Sjaunja, G. A. Ouédraogo, & S. Agenäs. 2010. Raw milk hygiene at farms, processing units and local markets in Burkina Faso. Food Control. 21:1070-1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.12.029

Notte, G., H. Cancela, M. Pedemonte, P. Chilibroste, W. Rossing, & J. C. J. Groot. 2020. A multi-objective optimization model for dairy feeding management. Agric. Syst. 183:102854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102854

Ponciano, P. F., & J. D. Scalon. 2010. Spatial analysis of the dairy yield using a conditional autoregressive model. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 31:487-496. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n2p487

Rivas, J., J. Perea, E. Angón, C. Barba, M. Morantes, R. Dios-Palomares, & A. García. 2015. Diversity in the dry land mixed system and viability of dairy sheep farming. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 14:179-186. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2015.3513

Roche, J. F. 2006. The effect of nutritional management of the dairy cow on reproductive efficiency. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 96:282-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.007

Vanh Der Ploeg, J. D. 2010. Rural development reconsidered : building on comparative perspectives from China, Brazil and the European Union. Rivistia Di Economia Agraria. 65:163-190.

Walsh, S. W., E. J. Williams, & A. C. O. Evans. 2011. A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 123:127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.12.001

Wong, C. Y. & G. Lim. 2020. A typology of agricultural production systems: Capability building trajectories of three Asian economies. Asia Pac. Viewp. 61:37-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12220

Zimpel, R., F. I. Bánkuti, M. A. Zambom, K. C. Kuwahara, & S. M. S. Bánkuti. 2017. Characteristics of the dairy farmers who perform financial management in Paraná State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 46:421-428. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-92902017000500008

Published
2021-03-09
How to Cite
Tramontini, R. C. M., Bánkuti , F. I., Pozza , M. S. S., Massuda , E. M., Damasceno, J. C., Dias, A. M., Ítavo, C. C. B. F., Ítavo, L. C. V., & Santos, G. T. (2021). Typology of Dairy Production Systems Based on Management Strategies in Paraná State, Brazil. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 44(1), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2021.44.1.123