Peningkatan Produktivitas Tanah Sulfat Masam dan Hasil Padi Menggunakan Bioarang dari Limbah Industri Penggergajian Kilang Kayu

Syamsul Bahri; Adnan Amin; Iwan  Saputra

doi:10.18343/jipi.29.1.1

Syamsul Bahri Program Studi Agroteknologi, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Samudra, Jalan Prof. Syarief Thayeb, Meurandeh, Aceh 24416
Adnan Amin Program Studi Agroteknologi, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Samudra, Jalan Prof. Syarief Thayeb, Meurandeh, Aceh 24416
Iwan Saputra Program Studi Agroteknologi, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Samudra, Jalan Prof. Syarief Thayeb, Meurandeh, Aceh 24416

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.29.1.1

Abstract

The study aims to analyze three aspects. (1) Formulation of biochar from wood refinery sawmill waste at pyrolysis temperatures of 450°C and 550°C with pyrolysis times of 2 and 4 hours. (2) The best wood refinery sawing waste biochar dosage to improve the chemical quality of acidic sulfate soil through improving soil pH, Al-dd, N, P, and K of the soil. (3) Growth and production of paddy on acidic sulfate soils by application of ameliorant biochar of waste sawmill wood mill. The research was conducted in acidic sulfate soil in a screen house in the Experimental Garden of the Faculty of Agriculture, Syiah Kuala University. Soil samples and biochar were analyzed at the Soil and Plant Research Laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture. The study was an experiment using a factorial complete randomized design with two factors: the temperature and pyrolysis time and the dose of biochar. The results showed that the application of biochar waste from sawmill wood refineries had a very significant and significant effect on improving the quality of acidic sulfate soil and the growth and production of rice fields. The formulation of biochar at a pyrolysis temperature of 550°C for 2-hour pyrolysis with 20 tons/ha is the best improvement in acid sulfate soil quality, growth, and rice field production.

Keywords: acid sulphate, biochar, paddy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajayi AE, Horn R. 2016. Modification of chemical and hydrophysical properties of two texturally differentiated soils due to varying magnitudes of added biochar. Soil and Tillage Reasearch. (164): 34‒44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.01.011

Akowuah JO, Kemausuor F, Mitchual SJ. 2012. Physico-chemical characteristics and market potential of sawdust charcoal briquette. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering. 3(1): 1‒6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-3-20

Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Horie T. 2009. Biochar amandement techniques for upland rice production in Nothern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research. 111: 81‒84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.for.2008.10.008

Bakker MR, Kerisit R, Verbist K, Nys C. 1999. Effect of liming on rhizosphere chemistry and growth of fine roots and of shoot of sessile oak. Plant Soil. 217 : 243‒255. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004518116551

Balai Besar Penelitian Tanaman Padi. 2009. Biochar Penyelamat Lingkungan. Warta Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. 31(6):

Barabasz W, Albinska D, Jaskowska M, Lipiec J. 2002. Ecotoxicology of Aluminium. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 11: 199‒203.

Bourbonniere RA, Creed IF. 2006. Biodegradability of dissolved organic matter extracted from a chronosequence of forest‐floor materials. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 169(1): 101‒107. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200521721

Deenik JL, Diarra A, Uehara G, Campbell S, Sumiyoshi Y, Antal Jr MJ. 2011. Charcoal ash and volatile matter effects on soil properties and plant growth in an acid Ultisol. Soil Science. 176(7): 336‒345. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31821fbfea

Gani A. 2009. Arang Hayati “Biochar” sebagai Komponen Perbaikan Produktivitas Lahan. Iptek Tanaman Pangan. 4(1): 33‒48.

Gusmalawati D, Mukarlina, Wahdina, Khotimah D. 2014. Struktur anotomi batang ulin (Eusideroxylon zwageri Teijsm. & Binned) varietas tando dan tembaga di Kalimantan Barat. Saintifika. 16(2): 49‒56

Hanum C. 2013. Pertumbuhan, hasil, dan mutu biji kedelai dengan pemberian pupuk organik dan fosfor. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia. 41: 209‒214.

Jeffery SFGA, Verheijen M, Velde, Vander, Batos AC. 2011. Aquantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta analisis. Agriculture Ecosystem and Enviroment. 144. 175‒187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015

Kinney TJ, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Hockaday WC, Dean MR, Zygourakis K, Barnes RT. 2012. Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass and Bioenergy. 41: 34‒43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.033

Kurniawan TP. 2006. Efikasi cuka kayu (wood vinegar) terhadap rayap tanah (Coptotermes curvignathus Holm) dari limbah kayu mahoni (Swietenia macrophylia King) dan kayu kihiyang (Albizia procera Benth).

Latuponu H, Shiddieq D, Syukur A, Hanudin H. 2011. Pengaruh biochar dari limbah sagu terhadap pelindian nitrogen di lahan kering masam. Agronomika. 11(2): 144‒155.

Leghari SJ, Wahocho NA, Laghari GM, Laghari AH, Bhabhan GM, Talpur KH, Lehmann J, Rondon M. 2006. Biochar soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. 113: 517‒530. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420017113.ch36

Liu X, Zhang A, Ji C, Joseph S, Bian R, Li L, Paz-ferreiro J. 2013. Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions-a meta- analysis of literature data. Plant Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1806-x

Pari G. 2016. Biochar technology as a go green movement in Indonesia. Journal of Wetlands Environmental Management. 2(1). https://doi.org/10.20527/jwem.v2i1.35

Saito M, Marumoto T. 2002. Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: the status quo in Japan and the future prospects. In Diversity and Integration in Mycorrhizas. Springer. Dordrecht. pp. 273‒279. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1284-2_27

Santi LP, Goenadi DH. 2010. Pemanfaatan biochar sebagai pembawa mikroba untuk pemantap agregat tanah Ultisol dari Taman Bogo-Lampung. Menara Perkebunan. 78(2): 52‒60.

Schmidt HP, Pandit BH, Kammann CI, Taylor P. 2014. the Biochar Journal.

Setiawati E, Mardiana D, Prijono S, Soemarno. 2016. Biochar untuk Tanah Sulfat Masam. Malang (ID): Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Brawijaya.

Situmeang YP. 2017. Utilization of Biochar, Compost, and Phonska in Improving Corn Results on Dry Land. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research (IRJEIS). 3(3): 38‒48. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v3i3.454

Smetanova A, Dotterweich M, Diehl D, Ulrich U, Dotterweich NF. 2013. Influence of biochar and terra preta substrates on wettability and erodibility of soils. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie. Supplementary Issues. 57(1): 111‒134. https://doi.org/10.1127/0372-8854/2012/S-00117

Steiner C. 2007. Soil charcoal amendments maintain soil fertility and establish carbon sink-research and prospects. Soil Ecology Res Dev. 1‒6.

Subagyo, H. 2006. Klasifikasi dan Penyebaran Lahan Rawa. Halaman 1-22 dalam Buku Karakteristik dan Pengelolaan Lahan Rawa. Bogor (ID): Balai Besar Litbang Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian.

Suriadikarta DA, Sutriadi MT. 2007. Jenis-jenis lahan berpotensi untuk pengembangan pertanian di lahan rawa. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian. 26(3): 115‒122.

Suriadikarta DA. 2005. Pengelolaan lahan sulfat masam untuk usaha pertanian. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian. 24(1): 36‒45.

Leghari SJ, Wahocho NA, Laghari GM, Laghari AH, Bhabhan GM, Talpur KH, Bhutto TA, Wahocho SA, Lashar AA. 2016. Role of nitrogen for plant growth and development: A review. Advances in Environmental Biology. 10(9): 209‒219.

Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris K, Chan A, Downie J, Rust, Cowie A. 2010. Effect of Biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermilwaste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil. 237: 235‒246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x

Zama EF, Zhu YG, Reid BJ, Sun GX. 2017. The Role of biochar properties in influencing the sorption and desorption of Pb (II), Cd (II) and As (III) in aqueous solution. Journal of Cleaner Production. 148: 127‒136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.125